Volume 7, Issue 2 (May 2022)                   JNFS 2022, 7(2): 167-180 | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Amini M, Doustmohammadian A, Rabiei S, Bazhan M, Abtahi M. Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to Dairy Consumption among School-Age Children: A Qualitative Study. JNFS 2022; 7 (2) :167-180
URL: http://jnfs.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-404-en.html
Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (1348 Views)
Background: To improve dairy consumption among children, it is crucial to explore probable barriers and facilitators toward it. The current qualitative study aims to discover barriers and facilitators of dairy intake among school-age children in Tehran to suggest strategies to improve it based on the optimal components of social marketing. Methods: In a qualitative study, 111 school-age children (mean age 10.08±0.57 years) were selected by purposive sampling with maximum diversity from primary schools in three areas of Tehran. Sixteen focus group discussions (FGDs) were separately conducted among students in different grades. Contents of the FGDs were analyzed using MAXQDA 2010. Results: Food and nutrition literacy, improvement of attitude and trust-building, training taste and food preferences were the main facilitators to increase dairy products among school-age children. Barriers related to dairy products consumption included negative attitudes toward dairy products, unsound tastes, and unhealthy food preferences. The main suggested strategies to increase dairy consumption were improvement of the products' sensory and non-sensory characteristics, providing the milk and dairy products consumption experience for free, improvement of the quality of preserving places, enhancing physical and economic availability of dairy products. Dairy stores and school buffets were mentioned as the best places for supply. Encouragement and motivation, education and information, modeling and promoting appropriate culture were suggested as the main promotion strategies. Conclusion: To provide practical strategies for increasing dairy consumption among children, the perceived barriers and facilitators mentioned by them should be addressed.
Full-Text [PDF 609 kb]   (292 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (244 Views)  
Type of article: orginal article | Subject: public specific
Received: 2021/05/5 | Published: 2022/05/30 | ePublished: 2022/05/30

1. Abdollahi M, et al. 2008. Qualitative study on nutritional knowledge of primary-school children and mothers in Tehran. EMHJ-eastern mediterranean health journal. 14 (1): 82-89.
2. Ambrosini GL, Emmett PM, Northstone K & Jebb SA 2014. Tracking a dietary pattern associated with increased adiposity in childhood and adolescence. Obesity. 22 (2): 458-465.
3. Amirhamidi Z, et al. 2019. Association of Weight Status with Dietary Intake and Dietary Diversity Score in 10-12-Year-Old Children in Tehran: A Cross-Sectional Study. Iranian journal of pediatrics. 29 (4).
4. Andreasen AR 2002. Marketing social marketing in the social change marketplace. Journal of public policy & marketing. 21 (1): 3-13.
5. Babolian Hendijani R & AbKarim M 2010. Factors affecting milk consumption among school children in urban and rural areas of Selangor, Malaysia. International food research journal. 17 (1): 651-660.
6. Bao N, et al. 2018. The consumption of dairy and its association with nutritional status in the south East Asian nutrition surveys (SEANUTS). Nutrients. 10 (6): 759.
7. Bazhan M, et al. 2018. Applying social marketing mix to identify consumers’ preferences towards functional dairy products in Iran. Nutrition & food science. 48 (1).
8. Doustmohammadian A, et al. 2020. Low food and nutrition literacy (FNLIT): a barrier to dietary diversity and nutrient adequacy in school age children. BMC research notes. 13 (1): 1-8.
9. Dror DK & Allen LH 2014. Dairy product intake in children and adolescents in developed countries: trends, nutritional contribution, and a review of association with health outcomes. Nutrition reviews. 72 (2): 68-81.
10. Esmerino EA, et al. 2017. Consumers' perceptions toward 3 different fermented dairy products: Insights from focus groups, word association, and projective mapping. Journal of dairy science. 100 (11): 8849-8860.
11. Gaskin DJ & Ilich JZ 2009. Lactose maldigestion revisited: Diagnosis, prevalence in ethnic minorities, and dietary recommendations to overcome it. American journal of lifestyle medicine. 3 (3): 212-218.
12. Grier S & Bryant CA 2005. Social marketing in public health. Annual review of public health. 26: 319-339.
13. Guest G, MacQueen KM & Namey EE 2012. Introduction to applied thematic analysis. Applied thematic analysis. 3: 20.
14. Hameed A, Waqas A, Aslam MN, Bilal M & Umair M 2014. Impact of TV advertisement on children buying behavior. International journal of humanities and social science. 4 (2): 246-261.
15. Hosseini Z, et al. 2017. Associated Factors of Milk Consumption among Students: Using Health Belief Model (HBM). International journal of pediatrics. 5 (2): 4439-4448.
16. Kanth N, Neel S, Santosh R & Abbasi Z 2019. Prevalence of Lactose Intolerance and its Association with Malnutrition in Children. National journal of health sciences. 4 (3): 103-109.
17. Kelishadi R, et al. 2007. Association of physical activity and dietary behaviours in relation to the body mass index in a national sample of Iranian children and adolescents: CASPIAN Study. Bulletin of the world health organization. 85: 19-26.
18. Larson NI, Story M, Wall M & Neumark-Sztainer D 2006. Calcium and dairy intakes of adolescents are associated with their home environment, taste preferences, personal health beliefs, and meal patterns. Journal of the American dietetic association. 106 (11): 1816-1824.
19. Maitiniyazi S & Canavari M 2021. Understanding Chinese consumers' safety perceptions of dairy products: a qualitative study. British food journal. 123 (5).
20. Marquez O, Racey M, Preyde M, Hendrie GA & Newton G 2015. Interventions to increase dairy consumption in adolescents: a systematic review. ICAN: infant, child, & adolescent nutrition. 7 (5): 242-254.
21. Mohebbi B 2014. The art of packaging: An investigation into the role of color in packaging, marketing, and branding. International journal of organizational leadership. 3: 92-102.
22. Neiger BL & Thackeray R 2002. Application of the SMART Model in two successful social marketing projects. American journal of health education. 33 (5): 301-303.
23. Park HJ, Lee JS & Kim EK 2010. Assessment of nutrition label education in sixth grade elementary school students. Journal of Korean diet association. 16 (3): 226.
24. Queirós A, Faria D & Almeida F 2017. Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European journal of education studies. 3 (9).
25. Rahnama H & Rajabpour S 2017. Factors for consumer choice of dairy products in Iran. Appetite. 111: 46-55.
26. Robinson OC 2014. Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative research in psychology. 11 (1): 25-41.
27. Rourke L, Anderson T, Garrison DR & Archer W 2001. Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International journal of artificial intelligence in education (IJAIED). 12: 8-22.
28. Saunders B, et al. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & quantity. 52 (4): 1893-1907.
29. Scholz-Ahrens KE, Ahrens F & Barth CA 2019. Nutritional and health attributes of milk and milk imitations. European journal of nutrition. 59 (1): 19-34.
30. Stead M, Gordon R, Angus K & McDermott L 2007. A systematic review of social marketing effectiveness. Health education. 107 (2): 126-191.
31. Tork Z, Omidvar N, Dehghani M & Doustmohammadian A 2021. Extent of food and nutrition literacy considerations in primary school curriculum and textbooks. Iranian journal of nutrition sciences and food technology. 16 (2): 33-43.
32. UNICEF Staff 2011. The state of the world's children 2011-executive summary: Adolescence an age of opportunity. Unicef.
33. Vaitkeviciute R, Ball LE & Harris N 2015. The relationship between food literacy and dietary intake in adolescents: a systematic review. Public health nutrition. 18 (4): 649-658.
34. Vidgen HA & Gallegos D 2014. Defining food literacy and its components. Appetite. 76: 50-59.
35. Wei C & Gregory JW 2009. Physiology of normal growth. Paediatrics and child health. 19 (5): 236-240.
36. Williams KE, Paul C, Pizzo B & Riegel K 2008. Practice does make perfect. A longitudinal look at repeated taste exposure. Appetite. 51 (3): 739-742.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Nutrition and Food Security

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb