Sat, Dec 21, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 7, Issue 2 (May 2022)
JNFS 2022, 7(2): 256-264 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Pourmoradian S, Kalantari N, Ostadrahimi A, Eini-Zinab H, Milani-Bonab A. Review of Nutrition Policy Options for Increasing Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in the Populations: Lesson Learned and Policy Implications. JNFS 2022; 7 (2) :256-264
URL: http://jnfs.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-398-en.html
URL: http://jnfs.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-398-en.html
Samira Pourmoradian 
, Naser Kalantari * , Alireza Ostadrahimi , Hassan Eini-Zinab , Ali Milani-Bonab
, Naser Kalantari * , Alireza Ostadrahimi , Hassan Eini-Zinab , Ali Milani-Bonab
Department of Community Nutrition, National Nutrition and Food Technology Research Institute, School of Nutrition Sciences and Food Technology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (1632 Views)
Background: The development of policies for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption is highlighted as a priority in developing countries. This review study aimed to present the available policy options for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in the populations. Methods: To collect relevant English publications, five electronic databases, including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, ProQuest, and Ovid from 2000 until 1st January 2021 were searched. The national or population based programs aimed to increase fruit and/or vegetable intake were included. Four types of policy options were recognized, including food promotion, school and workplace food environment regulations, agriculture, food production, supply and storage, and fiscal policies. Results: Increasing consumer’s knowledge has been more effective in increasing fruit and vegetable consumption among populations. However, most of the interventions in the workplace and school emphasize increasing knowledge and changing access to healthy food. Conclusion: In general, the evaluation of these policies has been done in the short term and has had a moderate impact on changing dietary behavior. Agricultural and food supply chain policies are currently less researched. Finally, recent evidence suggests that multi-component interventions are more effective than one-component interventions.
Type of article: review article |
Subject:
public specific
Received: 2021/04/10 | Published: 2022/05/30 | ePublished: 2022/05/30
Received: 2021/04/10 | Published: 2022/05/30 | ePublished: 2022/05/30
References
1. Alaimo K, Packnett E, Miles R & Kruger D 2008. Fruit and vegetable intake among urban community gardeners. Journal of nutrition education and behavior. 40 (2): 94-101.
2. An R 2013. Effectiveness of subsidies in promoting healthy food purchases and consumption: a review of field experiments. . Public health nutrition. 16 (7): 1215-1228.
3. Appleton KM, et al. 2016. Increasing vegetable intakes: rationale and systematic review of published interventions. European journal of nutrition. 55 (3): 869-896.
4. Aune D, et al. 2017. Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality—a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. International journal of epidemiology. 46 (3): 1029-1056.
5. Azizi F, et al. 2009. Prevention of non-communicable disease in a population in nutrition transition: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study phase II. Trials. 10 (1): 5.
6. Bere E, Veierød M, Bjelland M & Klepp K 2005. Free school fruit—sustained effect 1 year later. . Health education research. 21 (2): 268-275.
7. Black A, et al. 2012. Food subsidy programs and the health and nutritional status of disadvantaged families in high income countries: a systematic review. BMC public health. 12 (1): 1099.
8. Brambila-Macias J, et al. 2011. Policy interventions to promote healthy eating: a review of what works, what does not, and what is promising. . Food and nutrition bulletin. . 32 (4): 365-375.
9. Capacci S, et al. 2012. Policies to promote healthy eating in Europe: a structured review of policies and their effectiveness. . Nutrition reviews. 70 (3): 188-200.
10. Delgado-Noguera M, Tort S, Martínez-Zapata M & Bonfill X 2011. Primary school interventions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. . Preventive medicine. 53 (1-2): 3-9.
12. Dixon H, Borland R, Segan C, Stafford H & Sindall C 1998. Public reaction to Victoria's “2 Fruit ‘n’5 Veg Every Day” campaign and reported consumption of fruit and vegetables. . Preventive medicine. . 27 (4): 572-582.
13. Donovan R 2011. The role for marketing in public health change programs. . Australian review of public affairs. 10 (1): 23-40.
14. Foerster S, et al. 1995. California’s “5 a day—for better health!” campaign: an innovative population-based effort to effect large-scale dietary change. . American journal of preventive medicine. 11 (2): 124-131.
15. Francis M, Nichols S & Dalrymple N 2010. The effects of a school-based intervention programme on dietary intakes and physical activity among primary-school children in Trinidad and Tobago. . Public health nutrition. .(1-10).
16. French S & Stables G 2003. Environmental interventions to promote vegetable and fruit consumption among youth in school settings. Preventive medicine. 37 (6): 593-610.
17. French S & Wechsler H 2004. School-based research and initiatives: fruit and vegetable environment, policy, and pricing workshop. . Preventive medicine. 1 (39): 101-107.
18. Harris D, et al. 2012. Let’s move salad bars to schools: A public–private partnership to increase student fruit and vegetable consumption. . Childhood obesity 8(4): 294-297.
19. Herbert G, Butler L, Kennedy O & Lobb A 2010. Young UK adults and the 5 A DAY campaign: perceived benefits and barriers of eating more fruits and vegetables. International journal of consumer studies. . 34 (6): 657-664.
20. Herman D, Harrison G & Jenks E 2006. Choices made by low-income women provided with an economic supplement for fresh fruit and vegetable purchase. . Journal of the American dietetic association. 106 (5): 740-744.
21. Hyseni L, et al. 2017. The effects of policy actions to improve population dietary patterns and prevent diet-related non-communicable diseases: scoping review. . European journal of clinical nutrition. 71 (6): 694-711.
22. Jaime P & Lock K 2009. Do school based food and nutrition policies improve diet and reduce obesity? Preventive medicine. 48 (1): 45-53.
23. Kennedy B, et al. 2009. The" Rolling Store:" an economical and environmental approach to the prevention of weight gain in African American women. . Ethnicity & disease. 19 (1): 7*12.
24. Knai C, Pomerleau J, Lock K & McKee M 2006. Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. . Preventive medicine. 42 (2): 85-95.
25. Li M, Fan Y, Zhang X, Hou W & Tang Z 2014. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. BMJ open. 4 (11).
26. Moore L & Tapper K 2008. The impact of school fruit tuck shops and school food policies on children’s fruit consumption: a cluster randomised trial of schools in deprived areas. . Journal of epidemiology & community health. 62 (10): 926-931.
27. Mozaffarian D, et al. 2012. Population approaches to improve diet, physical activity, and smoking habits: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. . Circulation. 126 (12): 1514-1563.
28. Ohly H, Crossland N, Dykes F, Lowe N & Hall-Moran V 2017. A realist review to explore how low-income pregnant women use food vouchers from the UK’s Healthy Start programme. BMJ open. 7 (4): e013731.
29. Parmer S, Salisbury-Glennon J, Shannon D & Stru eB 2009. School gardens: an experiential learning approach for a nutrition education program to increase fruit and vegetable knowledge, preference, and consumption among second-grade students. . Journal of nutrition education and behavior. 41 (3): 212-217.
30. Pérez-Cueto F, et al. 2012. Assessment of evaluations made to healthy eating policies in Europe: a review within the EATWELL Project. . Public health nutrition. 15 (8): 1489-1496.
31. Pollard C, et al. 2008. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption: success of the Western Australian Go for 2&5® campaign. . Public health nutrition. 2008 (11): 3.
32. Powell L, Chriqui J, Khan T, Wada R & Chaloupka F 2013. Assessing the potential effectiveness of food and beverage taxes and subsidies for improving public health: a systematic review of prices, demand and body weight outcomes. . Obesity reviews. . 14 (2): 110-128.
33. Ransley J, et al. 2007. Does the school fruit and vegetable scheme improve children’s diet? A non-randomised controlled trial. . Journal of epidemiology & community health. 61 (8): 699-703.
34. Rekhy R & McConchie R 2014. Promoting consumption of fruit and vegetables for better health. Have campaigns delivered on the goals? . Appetite. 79: 112-123.
35. Rodriguez R, Norma P & Kim H 2019. eHealth Interventions for Fruit and Vegetable Intake: A Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness. Health education & behavior. 46 (6): 947-959.
36. Sassi F, Cecchini M, Lauer J & Chisholm D 2009. Improving lifestyles, tackling obesity: the health and economic impact of prevention strategies OECD health working papers.
37. Schwingshackl L, et al. 2015. Fruit and vegetable consumption and changes in anthropometric variables in adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. PloS one. 10 (10): e0140846.
38. Sorensen G, Linnan L & Hunt M 2004. Worksite-based research and initiatives to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. . Preventive medicine. 1 (39): 94-100.
39. Sorensen G, Stoddard A & Peterson K 1999. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through worksites and families in the Treatwell 5-A-Day Study. . American journal of public health 89 (1): 54-60.
40. Thomson C & Ravia J 2011. A systematic review of behavioral interventions to promote intake of fruit and vegetables. Journal of the American dietetic association. 111 (10): 1523-1535.
42. Thow A, Downs S & Jan S 2014. A systematic review of the effectiveness of food taxes and subsidies to improve diets: understanding the recent evidence. Nutrition reviews. 72 (9): 551-565.
43. Triador L, Farmer A, Maximova K, Willows N & Kootenay J 2015. A school gardening and healthy snack program increased Aboriginal First Nations children's preferences toward vegetables and fruit. Journal of nutrition education and behavior. 47 (2).
44. Twiss J, et al. 2009. Community gardens: lessons learned from California healthy cities and communities. . American journal of public health. 93 (9): 1435-1438.
45. Wu L, Sun D & He Y 2016. Fruit and vegetables consumption and incident hypertension: dose–response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Journal of human hypertension. 30 (10): 573-580.
46. Wymer W 2010. Rethinking the boundaries of social marketing: Activism or advertising? Journal of business research. . 63 (2): 99-103.
47. Yahia EM 2010. The contribution of fruit and vegetable consumption to human health. Fruit and vegetable phytochemicals. 3-51.
48. Yip CSC, Chan W & Fielding R 2019. The associations of fruit and vegetable intakes with burden of diseases: a systematic review of meta-analyses. Journal of the academy of nutrition and dietetics. 119 (3): 464-481.
49. Zinab H, Kalantari N, Ostadrahimi A, Tabrizi J & Pourmoradian S 2019. A Delphi study for exploring nutritional policy priorities to reduce prevalence of non-communicable diseases in Islamic Republic of Iran. Health promotion perspectives. 9 (3): 241-247.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
