Wed, Apr 24, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 7, Issue 1 (Feb 2022)
JNFS 2022, 7(1): 51-59 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sabah S S, Sharifan A, Akhonzadeh Basti A, Jannat B, TajAbadi Ebrahimi M. The Effect of Superheated Water Extraction Conditions on Properties of Quinoa-Barley Malt Extract. JNFS 2022; 7 (1) :51-59
URL: http://jnfs.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-383-en.html
URL: http://jnfs.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-383-en.html
Samireh Sabah Sabah 
, Anoshe Sharifan * , Afshin Akhonzadeh Basti , Behrooz Jannat , Maryam TajAbadi Ebrahimi
, Anoshe Sharifan * , Afshin Akhonzadeh Basti , Behrooz Jannat , Maryam TajAbadi Ebrahimi
Department of Food Science and Technology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (1302 Views)
Superheated water extraction (SWE), is a novel method, used to extract proteins or other bioactive component from agriculture products. Methods: In this study, the extract from quinoa-barley malt (in a proportion of 30:70) was treated by SWE method. The effect of extraction time (15, 30, and 45 min) on physicochemical and functional properties of the extract was determined at 120 ºC. Results: The result showed that by increasing the extraction time the amount of protein increased. The maximum protein (%) was obtained in 45 min of SWE. The results revealed that increasing the extraction time had a significant effect on the turbidity and pH. In addition, increasing the extraction time had a positive effect on the functional properties. The highest protein isolate (PI) solubility was at 120 °C. Conclusions: Although SWE method appears to be a useful extraction method for producing valuable materials from cereal and pseudocereal, this method has only been used at pre-commercial scale and more investigation is required to study the quantity, quality, and stability of the extracted valuable materials to scale it up for industrial means.
Type of article: orginal article |
Subject:
public specific
Received: 2021/03/5 | Published: 2022/01/22 | ePublished: 2022/01/22
Received: 2021/03/5 | Published: 2022/01/22 | ePublished: 2022/01/22
References
1. Abugoch L, et al. 2009. Stability of quinoa flour proteins (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) during storage. International journal of food science & technology. 44 (10): 2013-2020.
2. Ahmed J, Thomas L, Arfat YA & Joseph A 2018. Rheological, structural and functional properties of high-pressure treated quinoa starch in dispersions. Carbohydrate polymers. 197: 649-657.
3. Alboofetileh M, et al. 2019. Subcritical water extraction as an efficient technique to isolate biologically-active fucoidans from Nizamuddinia zanardinii. International journal of biological macromolecules. 128: 244-253.
4. Arendt EK & Zannini E 2013. Cereal grains for the food and beverage industries. Elsevier.
5. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International (AOAC) 2000. Official Methods of Analysis USA: Gaithersburg.
6. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International (AOAC) 2005. AOAC 2005. Official Methods of Analysis, Method 920.87, 934.01, 923.05, 993.19, 985.35, 995.11.
7. Betancur‐Ancona D, et al. 2009. Functional properties of hydrolysates from Phaseolus lunatus seeds. International journal of food science & technology. 44 (1): 128-137.
8. Cardinali F, Osimani A, Milanović V, Garofalo C & Aquilanti L 2021. Innovative Fermented Beverages Made with Red Rice, Barley, and Buckwheat. Foods. 10 (3): 613.
9. Chappell A, et al. 2017. The agronomic performance and nutritional content of oat and barley varieties grown in a northern maritime environment depends on variety and growing conditions. Journal of cereal science. 74: 1-10.
10. De Arcangelis E, et al. 2019. Structure analysis of β-glucan in barley and effects of wheat β-glucanase. Journal of cereal science. 85: 175-181.
11. Duran NM, Spelzini D, Wayllace N, Boeris V & da Silva FLB 2018. A combined experimental and molecular simulation study of factors influencing interaction of quinoa proteins–carrageenan. International journal of biological macromolecules. 107: 949-956.
12. Guerreo‐Ochoa MR, Pedreschi R & Chirinos R 2015. Optimised methodology for the extraction of protein from quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). International journal of food science & technology. 50 (8): 1815-1822.
13. Helric K 1990. AOAC Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
14. Hu H, et al. 2013. Effects of ultrasound on structural and physical properties of soy protein isolate (SPI) dispersions. Food hydrocolloids. 30 (2): 647-655.
15. Lamoolphak W, et al. 2006. Hydrothermal decomposition of yeast cells for production of proteins and amino acids. Journal of hazardous materials. 137 (3): 1643-1648.
16. Lin C 2011. Jianshe Chen, Jianyan Ren, and Mouming Zhao. Food hydrocolloid. 25 (5): 887-897.
17. López DN, Galante M, Robson M, Boeris V & Spelzini D 2018. Amaranth, quinoa and chia protein isolates: Physicochemical and structural properties. International journal of biological macromolecules. 109: 152-159.
18. Manoi K & Rizvi SS 2009. Physicochemical changes in whey protein concentrate texturized by reactive supercritical fluid extrusion. Journal of food engineering. 95 (4): 627-635.
19. Narita Y & Inouye K 2012. High antioxidant activity of coffee silverskin extracts obtained by the treatment of coffee silverskin with subcritical water. Food chemistry. 135 (3): 943-949.
20. Navruz-Varli S & Sanlier N 2016. Nutritional and health benefits of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of cereal science. 69: 371-376.
21. Nisar M, More D, Zubair S & Hashmi SI 2017. Physico-chemical and nutritional properties of quinoa seed: A review. Journal of pharmacognosy and phytochemistry. 6 (5): 2067-2069.
22. Pereira E, et al. 2019. Chemical and nutritional characterization of Chenopodium quinoa Willd (quinoa) grains: A good alternative to nutritious food. Food chemistry. 280: 110-114.
23. Pourali O, Asghari FS & Yoshida H 2009. Sub-critical water treatment of rice bran to produce valuable materials. Food chemistry. 115 (1): 1-7.
24. Salak Asghari F & Yoshida H 2006. Acid-catalyzed production of 5-hydroxymethyl furfural from D-fructose in subcritical water. Industrial & engineering chemistry research. 45 (7): 2163-2173.
25. Shimada K & Cheftel JC 1989. Sulfhydryl group/disulfide bond interchange reactions during heat-induced gelation of whey protein isolate. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 37 (1): 161-168.
26. Siebert KJ & Lynn P 2000. Effect of protein-polyphenol ratio on the size of haze particles. Journal of the American society of brewing chemists. 58 (3): 117-123.
27. Sommer S, Weber F & Harbertson JF 2019. Polyphenol–Protein–Polysaccharide Interactions in the Presence of Carboxymethyl Cellulose (CMC) in Wine-Like Model Systems. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 67 (26): 7428-7434.
28. Song C-L, et al. 2018. Effect of glycosylation and limited hydrolysis on structural and functional properties of soybean protein isolate. Journal of food measurement and characterization. 12 (4): 2946-2954.
29. Stounbjerg L, Vestergaard C, Andreasen B & Ipsen R 2018. Beverage clouding agents: Review of principles and current manufacturing. Food reviews international. 34 (7): 613-638.
30. Suriano S, et al. 2018. Phenolic acids profile, nutritional and phytochemical compounds, antioxidant properties in colored barley grown in southern Italy. Food research international. 113: 221-233.
31. Tavernier I, Patel AR, Van der Meeren P & Dewettinck K 2017. Emulsion-templated liquid oil structuring with soy protein and soy protein: κ-carrageenan complexes. Food hydrocolloids. 65: 107-120.
32. Teo CC, Tan SN, Yong JWH, Hew CS & Ong ES 2010. Pressurized hot water extraction (PHWE). Journal of chromatography A. 1217 (16): 2484-2494.
33. Valero-Cases E, Cerdá-Bernad D, Pastor J-J & Frutos M-J 2020. Non-dairy fermented beverages as potential carriers to ensure probiotics, prebiotics, and bioactive compounds arrival to the gut and their health benefits. Nutrients. 12 (6): 1666.
34. Yeom H-J, Lee E-H, Ha M-S, Ha S-D & Bae D-H 2010. SProduction and physicochemical properties of rice bran protein isolates prepared with autoclaving and enzymatic hydrolysis. Journal of the Korean society for applied biological chemistry. 53 (1): 62-70.
35. Yin S-W, Tang C-H, Wen Q-B & Yang X-Q 2007. Properties of cast films from hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) and soy protein isolates. A comparative study. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry. 55 (18): 7399-7404.
36. Yoon J-H, et al. 2009. Characteristics of a black soybean (Glycine max L. Merrill) protein isolate partially hydrolyzed by alcalase. Food science and biotechnology. 18 (2): 488-493.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
