Volume 7, Issue 2 (May 2022)                   JNFS 2022, 7(2): 208-219 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mazreati M, Nateghi L. Evaluation of the Quality Characteristics of Probiotic Ice Cream Produced from a Mixture of Camel Milk and Cow Milk during Frozen Storage. JNFS. 2022; 7 (2) :208-219
URL: http://jnfs.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-375-en.html
Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Varamin-Pishva Branch, Islamic Azad University, Varamin, Iran.
Abstract:   (280 Views)
 
Background: Ice cream is one of the most important and popular frozen desserts based on cow milk that is popular in the world. Due to the valuable properties of camel milk and with the aim of diversifying the production of this product and improving its nutritional quality, Methods: In the present study, ratios of 0%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80% of camel milk were replaced. The probiotic ice cream formulation contained Lactobacillus acidophilus and the samples were stored in a freezer at -18 °C and on the days after (first) production, thirty and sixty days were subjected to physicochemical, microbial, and sensory tests. Results: The results showed that the trend of changes in pH, specific gravity and volume increase was irregular. In contrast, the trends of fat changes, melting resistance, and sensory properties were decreasing. In physicochemical tests, treatment based on 40% cow milk had the highest pH value and volume increased, while the highest viscosity and melting resistance were related to camel milk treatment. The highest fat content and specific gravity belonged to 80% camel milk treatment. Treatment based on 40% cow milk showed the highest L. acidophilus count, while the treatment based on 60% cow milk had the lowest count. In terms of sensory properties, this treatment received the highest flavor and overall acceptance scores in terms of evaluators, while the highest color and texture score belonged to the treatment based on 40% and 70% camel milk, respectively. Conclusion: The overall results showed that cow milk can be replaced by probiotic ice cream formulation with different proportions of camel milk and obtained a desirable product. Finally, treatments based on higher ratios of camel milk had better quality properties and 60% of camel milk was selected as optimum treatment.
Full-Text [PDF 613 kb]   (61 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (29 Views)  
Type of article: orginal article | Subject: public specific
Received: 2021/02/2 | Accepted: 2021/12/26 | Published: 2022/05/30 | ePublished: 2022/05/30

References
1. Abu-Lehia IH, Al-Mohizea IS & El-Behry M 1989. Studies on the production of ice cream from camel milk products. Australian journal of dairy technology.
2. Aghajani A, Pourahmad R & Mahdavi AH 2012. Evaluation of physicochemical changes and survival of probiotic bacteria in synbiotic yoghurt. Journal of food biosciences and technology. 2 (2): 13-22.
3. Ahmed A & El Zubeir I 2015. Processing properties an d chemical composition of low fat ice cream made from camel mil k using natural additives. International journal of dairy science. 10 (6): 297-305.
4. Aime D, Arntfield S, Malcolmson L & Ryland D 2001. Textural analysis of fat reduced vanilla ice cream products. Food research international. 34 (2-3): 237-246.
5. Akalın A & Erişir D 2008. Effects of inulin and oligofructose on the rheological characteristics and probiotic culture survival in low‐fat probiotic ice cream. Journal of food science. 73 (4): M184-M188.
6. Arbuckle WS 2013. Ice cream. Springer.
7. Ayadi M, et al. 2009. Effects of milking interval and cisternal udder evaluation in Tunisian Maghrebi dairy dromedaries (Camelus dromedarius L.). Journal of dairy science. 92 (4): 1452-1459.
8. Bahramparvar M, Haddad K, Mohammad H & Razavi SM 2009. The effect of Lallemantia royleana (Balangu) seed, palmate‐tuber salep and carboxymethylcellulose gums on the physicochemical and sensory properties of typical soft ice cream. International journal of dairy technology. 62 (4): 571-576.
9. De Prisco A & Mauriello G 2016. Probiotication of foods: A focus on microencapsulation tool. Trends in food science & technology. 48: 27-39.
10. Desmond C, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, Collins K & Ross RP 2002. Environmental adaptation of probiotic lactobacilli towards improvement of performance during spray drying. International dairy journal. 12 (2-3): 183-190.
11. Donkor ON, Nilmini S, Stolic P, Vasiljevic T & Shah N 2007. Survival and activity of selected probiotic organisms in set-type yoghurt during cold storage. International dairy journal. 17 (6): 657-665.
12. Duboc P & Mollet B 2001. Applications of exopolysaccharides in the dairy industry. International dairy journal. 11 (9): 759-768.
13. Eva C & Socaciu C 2008. Influence Of Raw Milk Quality On The Multiplication Of Probiotic Microorgamisms. Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Sciences & Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Agriculture. 65 (2).
14. Flores A & Goff H 1999. Ice crystal size distributions in dynamically frozen model solutions and ice cream as affected by stabilizers. Journal of dairy science. 82 (7): 1399-1407.
15. Ghanbari M & Farmani J 2013. Influence of hydrocolloids on dough properties and quality of barbari: an Iranian leavened flat bread. Journal of agricultural science and technology. 15 (3): 545-555.
16. Gilliland S & Walker D 1990. Factors to consider when selecting a culture of Lactobacillus acidophilus as a dietary adjunct to produce a hypocholesterolemic effect in humans. Journal of dairy science. 73 (4): 905-911.
17. Girard M & Schaffer-Lequart C 2007. Gelation of skim milk containing anionic exopolysaccharides and recovery of texture after shearing. Food hydrocolloids. 21 (7): 1031-1040.
18. Gonzalez-Gonzalez C, Tuohy K & Jauregi P 2011. Production of angiotensin-I-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory activity in milk fermented with probiotic strains: Effects of calcium, pH and peptides on the ACE-inhibitory activity. International dairy journal. 21 (9): 615-622.
19. Guarda A, Rosell C, Benedito C & Galotto M 2004. Different hydrocolloids as bread improvers and antistaling agents. Food hydrocolloids. 18 (2): 241-247.
20. Hagen M & Narvhus J 1999. Production of ice cream containing probiotic bacteria. Milchwissenschaft. 54 (5): 265-268.
21. Hekmat S & McMAHON DJ 1992. Survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium bifidum in ice cream for use as a probiotic food. Journal of dairy science. 75 (6): 1415-1422.
22. Herald TJ, Aramouni FM & ABU‐GHOUSH MH 2008. Comparison study of egg yolks and egg alternatives in French vanilla ice cream. Journal of texture studies. 39 (3): 284-295.
23. Innocente N, Comparin D & Corradini C 2002. Proteose-peptone whey fraction as emulsifier in ice-cream preparation. International dairy journal. 12 (1): 69-74.
24. Iyer R & Hittinahalli V 2008. Modified PAP method to detect heteroresistance to vancomycin among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates at a tertiary care hospital. Indian journal of medical microbiology. 26 (2): 176.
25. Javidi F, Razavi SMA, Mazaheri Tehrani M & Emadzadeh B 2015. Effect of guar and basil seed gums on physical properties of low fat and light ice cream. Iranian journal food science and technology research. 11 (5): 696-706.
26. Jooyandeh H, Danesh E & Goudarzi M 2017. Effect of microbial transglutaminase on physical, rheological, textural and sensory properties of light ice cream. Iranian Food Science and Technology Research Journal. 13 (4): 469-479.
27. López-Rubira V, Conesa A, Allende A & Artés F 2005. Shelf life and overall quality of minimally processed pomegranate arils modified atmosphere packaged and treated with UV-C. Postharvest biology and technology. 37 (2): 174-185.
28. Magarinos H, Selaive S, Costa M, Flores M & Pizarro O 2007. Viability of probiotic micro‐organisms (Lactobacillus acidophilus la‐5 and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. Lactis bb‐12) in ice cream. International journal of dairy technology. 60 (2): 128-134.
29. Mariotti M, Lucisano M & Ambrogina Pagani M 2006. Development of a baking procedure for the production of oat‐supplemented wheat bread. International journal of food science & technology. 41: 151-157.
30. Milani E & Koocheki A 2011. The effects of date syrup and guar gum on physical, rheological and sensory properties of low fat frozen yoghurt dessert. International journal of dairy technology. 64 (1): 121-129.
31. Moeenfard M & Tehrani MM 2008. Effect of some stabilizers on the physicochemical and sensory properties of ice cream type frozen yogurt. American-Eurasian journal of agricultural & environmental science. 4 (5): 584-589.
32. Mohammadi Sani A 2015. Replacement of Salep with Salvia macrosiphon Boiss and its impact on physicochemical and sensory properties of traditional ice cream. Food science and technology. 13 (54): 95-104.
33. Molin G & Mazza G 2008. Handbook of fermented functional foods. Boca Raton, CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
34. Muse M & Hartel RW 2004. Ice cream structural elements that affect melting rate and hardness. Journal of dairy science. 87 (1): 1-10.
35. Niasari-Naslaji A, Arabha H, Atakpour A, Salami M & Moosavi-Movahedi A 2012. Camel Milk and its Bioactive Molecules in Medical Treatments. Science cultivation. 2 (1): 20-24.
36. Nousia FG, Androulakis PI & Fletouris DJ 2011. Survival of Lactobacillus acidophilus LMGP‐21381 in probiotic ice cream and its influence on sensory acceptability. International journal of dairy technology. 64 (1): 130-136.
38. Ozkoc SO, Sumnu G & Sahin S 2009. The effects of gums on macro and micro-structure of breads baked in different ovens. Food hydrocolloids. 23 (8): 2182-2189.
39. Rezaei R, Khomeiri M, Kashaninejad M & Aalami M 2011. Effects of guar gum and arabic gum on the physicochemical, sensory and flow behaviour characteristics of frozen yoghurt. International journal of dairy technology. 64 (4): 563-568.
40. Romanchik-Cerpovicz JE, Tilmon RW & Baldree KA 2002. Moisture retention and consumer acceptability of chocolate bar cookies prepared with okra gum as a fat ingredient substitute. Journal of the American dietetic association. 102 (9): 1301-1303.
41. Rosell CM, Rojas JA & De Barber CB 2001. Influence of hydrocolloids on dough rheology and bread quality. Food hydrocolloids. 15 (1): 75-81.
42. Sahan N, Yasar K & Hayaloglu A 2008. Physical, chemical and flavour quality of non-fat yogurt as affected by a β-glucan hydrocolloidal composite during storage. Food hydrocolloids. 22 (7): 1291-1297.
43. Shamsia S 2009. Nutritional and therapeutic properties of camel and human milks. International journal of genetics and molecular biology. 1 (4): 052-058.
44. Shu G, et al. 2017. Microencapsulation of Lactobacillus acidophilus by xanthan-chitosan and its stability in yoghurt. Polymers. 9 (12): 733.
45. Soukoulis C, Chandrinos I & Tzia C 2008. Study of the functionality of selected hydrocolloids and their blends with κ-carrageenan on storage quality of vanilla ice cream. Food science and technology. 41 (10): 1816-1827.
46. Stahl T, Sallmann H-P, Duehlmeier R & Wernery U 2006. Selected vitamins and fatty acid patterns in dromedary milk and colostrum. Journal of camel practice and research. 13 (1): 53-57.
47. Tharmaraj N & Shah N 2003. Selective enumeration of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, bifidobacteria, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, and propionibacteria. Journal of dairy science. 86 (7): 2288-2296.
48. Turgut T & Cakmakci S 2009. Investigation of the possible use of probiotics in ice cream manufacture. International journal of dairy technology. 62 (3): 444-451.
49. Vasiljevic T, Kealy T & Mishra V 2007. Effects of β‐glucan addition to a probiotic containing yogurt. Journal of food science. 72 (7): C405-C411.
50. Vinderola CG & Reinheimer JA 2000. Enumeration of Lactobacillus casei in the presence of L. acidophilus, bifidobacteria and lactic starter bacteria in fermented dairy products. International dairy journal. 10 (4): 271-275

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Nutrition and Food Security

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb