ARTICLE INFO | ABSTRACT | |
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW and META-ANALYSIS | Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common metabolic disorder among age reproductive women. It could result in anovulation, infertility insulin resistance, and obesity. Dietary intake especially antioxidant components may improve some disorders. The current study is the first meta-analysis to assess the effect of green tea, a source of antioxidants, on anthropometric and insulin among women with PCOS. Methods: In this meta-analysis, the databases of PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Cochran, and Web of Science were searched up to March 2019. The I-square (I2), a statistical measure of heterogeneity, was used to assess the heterogeneity. Egger's test was used for the assessment of publication bias. Results: Green tea reduced weight -3.07 kg (-6.53 to -0.44, P = 0.03), fasting insulin -0.50 mIU/l -3.72 (-5.16 -2.28, P = 0.001), waist to hip ratio (WHR) -0.04 (-0.06 to -0.017, P = 0.001), body mass index -0.32 to kg/cm2 (-1.63 to 1, P = 0.09), and body fat percentage -1.13(-5.30 to 3.04, P = 0.51). Conclusion: The green tea supplement has some mild decreasing effect on weight, WHR, and fasting insulin significantly. It seems green tea could improve weight and glycemic control in women with PCOS. Keywords: Green tea; Herbal tea; Catechin; PCOS; Polycystic ovary Syndrome |
|
Article history: Received: 8 Apr 2021 Revised:30 Aug 2021 Accepted: 15 Sep 2021 |
||
*Corresponding author: s_shabbidar@tums.ac.ir Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Science and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Postal code: 14155/6117 Tel: +98 21 88955975 |
P |
Figure 1. Risk of bias overall diagram |
Table 1. Characteristics of the included studies. | ||||||||
Author | Year | Country | Type of study | Number Intervention/Placebo | Mean (SD) age |
Daily dosage | Follow-up | Outcomes |
Chan, et al. |
2006 |
Hong Kong |
Randomized placebo controlled Study |
34 18/16 |
34.8 (4.2) |
540 mg/d Green tea extract capsule |
12 Week |
No significant reduction in BMI in green tea group Significant rise in BMI, weight, and body fat in the control group No difference in hormonal level No significant reduction in amenorrhoeic |
Mombaini, et al. |
2017 |
Iran |
Randomized double-blind controlled Study |
45 22/23 |
23.2 (5.2) |
500 mg/d Green tea capsule |
6 Week |
Significant reduction in BMI, weight, and body fat in green tea group No significant change in inflammation marker level (IL6,TNF-a, h-CRP) |
Allahdadian, et al. |
2015 |
Iran |
Randomized controlled study |
60 30/30 |
30.0(5.0) |
500 mg/d Green tea tablet |
12 Week |
Significant reduction in weight, fasting insulin, and free testosterone in green tea group |
Mean age of participants was 34±3.35 y. Dose range of green tea extract capsule were 500-540 mg/day, mean duration of intervention was 10±2 week (6-12 week). |
Table 2. The effect of green tea on body weight, body mass index, body fat, waist hip ratio, and fasting insulin. | ||||
Variables | Effect size (95%CI) | P Significant | P Heterogeneity | |
Body weight | -3.07 (-5.70 - -0.44) | 0.022 | 0. 568 | 1.13 |
Body mass index | -0.17 (-1.50 - 1.14) | 0.792 | 0.940 | 0.01 |
Body fat | -0.55 (-4.24 - 3.12) | 0.766 | 0.778 | 0.08 |
Waist hip ratio | -0.04 (-0.06 - -0.01) | 0.001 | 1 | 0.0 |
Fasting insulin | -3.72 (-5.16 - -2.28) | 0.001 | 0.756 | 0.0 |
Section/topic | # | Checklist item | Reported on page # |
TITLE | |||
Title | 1 | Identify the report as a systematic review, meta-analysis, or both. | 1 |
ABSTRACT | |||
Structured summary | 2 | Provide a structured summary including, as applicable: background; objectives; data sources; study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions; study appraisal and synthesis methods; results; limitations; conclusions and implications of key findings; systematic review registration number. | 1 |
INTRODUCTION | |||
Rationale | 3 | Describe the rationale for the review in the context of what is already known. | 2 |
Objectives | 4 | Provide an explicit statement of questions being addressed with reference to participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study design (PICOS). | 2 |
METHODS | |||
Protocol and registration | 5 | Indicate if a review protocol exists, if and where it can be accessed (e.g., Web address), and, if available, provide registration information, including registration number. | 2-3 |
Eligibility criteria | 6 | Specify study characteristics (e.g., PICOS, length of follow-up) and report characteristics (e.g., years considered, language, publication status) used as criteria for eligibility, giving rationale. | 3 |
Information sources | 7 | Describe all information sources (e.g., databases with dates of coverage, contact with study authors to identify additional studies) in the search and date last searched. | 3 |
Search | 8 | Present full electronic search strategy for at least one database, including any limits used, such that it could be repeated. | 3 |
Study selection | 9 | State the process for selecting studies (i.e., screening, eligibility, included in systematic review, and, if applicable, included in the meta-analysis). | 3 |
Data collection process | 10 | Describe method of data extraction from reports (e.g., piloted forms, independently, in duplicate) and any processes for obtaining and confirming data from investigators. | 3 |
Data items | 11 | List and define all variables for which data were sought (e.g., PICOS, funding sources) and any assumptions and simplifications made. | 3 |
Risk of bias in individual studies | 12 | Describe methods used for assessing risk of bias of individual studies (including specification of whether this was done at the study or outcome level), and how this information is to be used in any data synthesis. | 3 |
Summary measures | 13 | State the principal summary measures (e.g., risk ratio, difference in means). | 4 |
Synthesis of results | 14 | Describe the methods of handling data and combining results of studies, if done, including measures of consistency (e.g., I2) for each meta-analysis. | 4 |
Risk of bias across studies | 15 | Specify any assessment of risk of bias that may affect the cumulative evidence (e.g., publication bias, selective reporting within studies). | 4 |
Additional analyses | 16 | Describe methods of additional analyses (e.g., sensitivity or subgroup analyses, meta-regression), if done, indicating which were pre-specified. | |
RESULTS | |||
Study selection | 17 | Give numbers of studies screened, assessed for eligibility, and included in the review, with reasons for exclusions at each stage, ideally with a flow diagram. | 4-5 |
Study characteristics | 18 | For each study, present characteristics for which data were extracted (e.g., study size, PICOS, follow-up period) and provide the citations. | 4-5 |
Risk of bias within studies | 19 | Present data on risk of bias of each study and, if available, any outcome level assessment (see item 12). | 5 |
Results of individual studies | 20 | For all outcomes considered (benefits or harms), present, for each study: (a) simple summary data for each intervention group (b) effect estimates and confidence intervals, ideally with a forest plot. | 5 |
Synthesis of results | 21 | Present results of each meta-analysis done, including confidence intervals and measures of consistency. | 5-8 |
Risk of bias across studies | 22 | Present results of any assessment of risk of bias across studies (see Item 15). | 8 |
Additional analysis | 23 | Give results of additional analyses, if done (e.g., sensitivity or subgroup analyses, meta-regression [see Item 16]). | |
DISCUSSION | |||
Summary of evidence | 24 | Summarize the main findings including the strength of evidence for each main outcome; consider their relevance to key groups (e.g., healthcare providers, users, and policy makers). | 8 |
Limitations | 25 | Discuss limitations at study and outcome level (e.g., risk of bias), and at review-level (e.g., incomplete retrieval of identified research, reporting bias). | 9 |
Conclusions | 26 | Provide a general interpretation of the results in the context of other evidence, and implications for future research. | 9-10 |
FUNDING | |||
Funding | 27 | Describe sources of funding for the systematic review and other support (e.g., supply of data); role of funders for the systematic review. | 10 |
Search strategy in PubMed | ||
Concept 1# | Concept 2# | Concept 3# |
PCOS [Mesh] | Tea"[Mesh] | Randomized Trials [Mesh] |
Syndrome, Polycystic Ovary [Mesh] | EGCG [Mesh] | Randomized Controlled Trial [Mesh] |
Syndrome, Polycystic Ovarian [Mesh] | catechin [Mesh] | Random Allocation [Mesh] |
Stein Leventhal Syndrome [Mesh] | Tea Polyphenols [Mesh] | Randomised Controlled trials [Mesh] |
Ovary Syndrome, Polycystic [Mesh] | Green Tea Extract [Mesh] | Clinical Trial [Mesh] |
Sclerocystic Ovary Syndrome [Mesh] | Tea [tiab] | Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic [Mesh] |
Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome [Mesh] | Green Tea Oral [tiab] | Controlled Clinical Trials [Mesh] |
Ovarian Syndrome, Polycystic [Mesh] | Tea Supplement [tiab] | Randomized Clinical Trial [tiab] |
PCOS [tiab] | Green Tea Extract [tiab] | Controlled Clinical Trials [tiab] |
Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome [tiab] | Tea Polyphenols [tiab] | Placebo [tiab] |
PCOS [tiab] | EGCG [tiab] | Randomised Controlled Trials [tiab] |
Stein-Leventhal Syndrome [tiab] | catechin [tiab] | Randomized Trial [tiab] |
“epigallocatechin gallate" [tiab] | Clinical Trial [tiab] | |
RCT[tiab] | ||
Randomised [tiab] |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |