ARTICLE INFO | ABSTRACT | |
ORIGINAL ARTICLE | Background: Food and nutrition services in hospitals are one of the factors effecting patients’ satisfaction. Appropriate management and supervision in the nutrition sector is an essential factor in reducing the costs and gaining patient satisfaction. The optimal performance of the nutrition sector accelerates improvement and can be useful in their satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients’ satisfaction with food and nutrition services in 2016-2017, Yazd, Iran. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The study population included patients referring to the selected hospitals affiliated to Yazd Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences. A researcher-made questionnaire was used for data collection. This questionnaire had 19 questions that should be answered on a 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree, agree, no idea, disagree, and strongly disagree). At the end of this questionnaire, a question was presented about the individual’s overall satisfaction with nutrition. Results: The average of patients’ satisfaction with food services was 4.40 ± 0.90. The lowest satisfaction rate was related to the inappropriate quality of dinner with an average of 4.02 ± 1.50. The highest level of satisfaction was related to the hygiene of food with an average of 4.69 ± 0.55. Conclusion: Hospital managers are required to take measures to increase the awareness of nutrition service personnel regarding the health and quality of food, their active presence by patients’ beds, give patients the right to choose, and take the necessary supervision to increase the variety of meals. Keywords: Patient satisfaction; Hospital; Nutrition services |
|
Article history: Received: 18 Aug 2020 Revised: 28 Nov 2020 Accepted: 26 Nov 2020 |
||
*Corresponding author msaffari@ssu.ac.ir Human Resource Management, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. Postal code: 89116978477 Tel: +98 9132579839 |
Table 1. Demographic characteristics of hospitalized patients | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | N | Variables | % | N | Variables |
11.5 |
169 |
Age (y) < 20 |
8.3 |
117 |
Jobs Student |
37.3 | 546 | 20-40 | 48.2 | 679 | Housewife |
27.2 | 397 | 40-60 | 10.2 | 143 | Retired |
20.8 | 304 | 60-80 | 3.8 | 54 | Unemployed |
3.2 | 47 | 80 < | 5.2 | 72 | Public employment |
45.7 |
685 |
Gender Male |
10.7 | 152 | Private working |
54.3 | 811 | Female | 2.4 | 35 | Temporary job |
79.9 |
1111 |
Marital Status Married |
11.2 | 157 | Worker |
14.0 | 194 | Single | 9.2 |
138 |
Wards Orthopedic |
0.6 | 8 | Divorced | 6.9 | 103 | Children |
5.5 | 77 | Dead Spouse | 1.9 | 25 | Urology |
28.9 |
415 |
Education levels Illiterate |
14.5 | 215 | General surgery |
23.5 | 337 | Elementary | 3.7 | 56 | Neurosurgery |
13.5 | 194 | Guidance | 2.0 | 30 | Eye |
20.2 | 290 | Diploma | 14.1 | 210 | Internal |
13.9 | 200 | Academic | 10.5 | 157 | CCU |
24.6 |
376 |
Hospitals Afshar |
16.5 | 246 | Obstetrics & Gynecology |
13.1 | 199 | Shahid Rahnamun | 3.0 | 46 | Infectious |
22.3 | 342 | Shahid Sadoughi | 15.3 | 228 | Heart |
16.6 | 253 | Ardakan Ziaee | 1.6 | 24 | Neurology |
23.4 | 357 | Mehriz Fatemeh Al-Zahra | 3.2 | 49 | ENT |
Table 2. Mean and standard deviation of the components associated with patients ' satisfaction from food and nutrition services | |
---|---|
Components | Mean ± SD |
The breakfast distribution time was appropriate. | 4.44 ± 1.42 |
The diversity of foods intended for breakfast was appropriate. | 4.39 ± 0.86 |
The amount of breakfast food was appropriate. | 4.48 ± 0.74 |
The quality of breakfast was appropriate. | 4.46 ± 0.73 |
The time of the lunch distribution was appropriate. | 4.39 ± 0.83 |
The diversity of foods intended for lunch was appropriate. | 4.43 ± 0.76 |
The amount of food lunch was appropriate. | 4.38 ± 0.82 |
Lunch quality was appropriate. | 4.26 ± 1.06 |
The dinner distribution time was appropriate | 4.28 ± 1.17 |
The diversity of foods intended for dinner was appropriate. | 4.48 ± 0.70 |
The amount of food was suitable for dinner. | 4.43 ± 0.78 |
The quality of dinner was appropriate. | 4.02 ± 1.50 |
Your taste was considered breakfast, lunch, and dinner. | 4.08 ± 1.22 |
The dishes used for serving food were hygienic and appropriate. | 4.43 ± 0.80 |
The manner and time of tea distribution and boiling water were appropriate. | 4.33 ± 0.93 |
Quality of bread was suitable in the hospital. | 4.50 ± 0.86 |
The method of dealing with food distribution personnel was appropriate. | 4.53 ± 0.68 |
The gathering of containers after food distribution was appropriate. | 4.52 ± 0.70 |
Observing the health principles (having white and clean robes, disposable gloves, hats, etc.) was appropriate by food distribution personnel. | 4.69 ± 0.55 |
Table 3. Comparison mean (±SD) patients’ satisfaction scores in term of some patients' characteristics | ||
---|---|---|
Variables | Mean ± SD | P-value |
Age (y) < 20 |
4.23 ± 0.56 |
< 0.001a |
20-40 | 4.38 ± 0.51 | |
40-60 | 4.47 ± 0.52 | |
60-80 | 4.42 ± 0.52 | |
80 < | 4.44 ± 0.59 | |
Gender Male |
4.34 ± 0.52 |
< 0.001b |
Female | 4.45 ± 0.52 | |
Marital Status Married |
4.41 ± 0.52 |
< 0.001a |
Single | 4.25 ± 0.56 | |
Divorced | 4.36 ± 0.77 | |
Dead spouse | 4.44 ± 0.56 | |
Education levels Illiterate |
4.51 ± 0.50 |
< 0.001a |
Elementary | 4.44 ± 0.49 | |
Guidance | 4.29 ± 0.56 | |
Diploma | 4.29 ± 0.52 | |
Graduate | 4.40 ± 0.51 | |
Bachelor | 4.27 ± 0.49 | |
Masters | 4.45 ± 0.59 | |
Job Student |
4.24 ± 0.50 |
< 0.001a |
Housewife | 4.48 ± 0.50 | |
Retired | 4.25 ± 0.50 | |
Unemployed | 4.37 ± 0.61 | |
Public employment | 4.39 ± 0.53 | |
Private working | 4.40 ± 0.59 | |
Temporary job | 4.19 ± 0.49 | |
Worker | 4.45 ± 0.48 | |
a: Independent t-test; b: One-way analysis of variance |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |