ARTICLE INFO | ABSTRACT | |
ORIGINAL ARTICLE | Background: Eggs are of the few naturally occurring foods that meet the needs of human body in a balanced manner. The present study was conducted to determine the rate of egg per capita consumption in Tehran city in 2018. Methods: The present cross-sectional study was conducted on 4.213 heads of families living in 22 regions of Tehran. Selected randomly using multistage cluster sampling method. The research data were collected through a researcher-made questionnaire completed by interviews. Results: Mean egg consumption per person was 2.58 per week and 134 per capita (95%CI; 134-137). Moreover, 39.59% of the participants believed that brown-shelled eggs had a higher nutritional value and 61.99% were unaware about the presence of omega 3-enriched eggs. Concerning the participants' attitudes towards egg consumption effective factors, the 'recommendations of physicians and nutritionists to use eggs' and knowing about harmlessness of cholesterol found in eggs' received the mean highest scores of 3.47 and 3.31, respectively. Conclusion: Per capita consumption of eggs among families in Tehran was much lower than the recommended standards. Physicians and nutritionists are recommended to try to raise the community awareness about the nutritional value and correct the misconceptions about egg cholesterol. Keywords: Egg; Per capita; Cholesterol; Attitude; Tehran |
|
Article history: Received: 27 Feb 2019 Revised: 21 Jun 2020 Accepted: 12 Jun 2019 |
||
*Corresponding author: vahid.rahmani1392@gmail.com Research Center for social determinants of health, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran. Postal code: 7414846199 Tel: +98-9175985204 |
Table 1. Ranking and per capita consumption of eggs * | |||||
Rank | Country | Per capita consumption | Rank | Country | Per capita consumption |
1 | Mexico | 357 | 22 | Slovakia | 210 |
2 | Japan | 330 | 23 | Turkey | 200 |
3 | Malaysia | 315 | 24 | Finland | 198 |
4 | Ukraine | 314 | 25 | Peru | 198 |
5 | Russia | 291 | 26 | Netherlands | 195 |
6 | Argentina | 266 | 27 | Iran | 192 |
7 | Columbia | 252 | 28 | Brazil | 192 |
8 | America | 252 | 29 | Emirates | 190 |
9 | Denmark | 248 | 30 | England | 189 |
10 | China | 242 | 31 | Belgium | 182 |
11 | Czech Republic | 242 | 32 | Swiss | 174 |
12 | Austria | 234 | 33 | Ireland | 169 |
13 | Canada | 233 | 34 | Chile | 166 |
14 | Germany | 233 | 35 | Poland | 160 |
15 | Australia | 226 | 36 | Cyprus | 150 |
16 | New Zealand | 225 | 37 | Guatemala | 148 |
17 | Spain | 225 | 38 | South Africa | 143 |
18 | France | 221 | 39 | Portugal | 142 |
19 | Italy | 221 | 40 | Greece | 127 |
20 | Sweden | 220 | 41 | India | 65 |
21 | Hungary | 215 |
Table 2. Frequency distribution and mean score of the participants' attitudes towards the factors affecting egg consumption | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factors | Ineffective | Low | Moderate | High | Very high | Mean score of items out of 5 |
N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
Prices of eggs | 1281(30.41) | 720(17.09) | 1190(28.25) | 654(15.52) | 368(8.73) | 2.53 |
Prices of other protein products | 1064(25.26) | 836(19.84) | 1097(20.04) | 851(20.20) | 365(8.66) | 2.66 |
Family income | 1332(31.62) | 745(17.68) | 1186(28.15) | 601(14.27) | 349(8.28) | 2.51 |
Availability of eggs | 1052(24.97) | 969(16.52) | 1237(29.36) | 857(20.34) | 371(8.81) | 2.73 |
Variability in production of eggs | 794(18.85) | 787(17.68) | 1409(33.44) | 765(20.53) | 358(8.50) | 2.79 |
Public awareness of the nutritional value of eggs | 502(11.92) | 556(13.20) | 4041(24.71) | 1304(35.95) | 810(19.23) | 3.28 |
Appearance of the egg (color, shell, size, etc.) | 981(23.29) | 859(20.39) | 1042(24.73) | 773(18.35) | 558(13.24) | 2.76 |
Advice from doctors and nutritionists | 344(8.17) | 481(11.42) | 1095(25.99) | 1415(33.59) | 878(20.84) | 3.47 |
Advertising on TV and radio | 839(19.91) | 982(22.31) | 987(23.43) | 914(21.69) | 491(11.65) | 2.79 |
Distribution of educational posters and magazines | 987(23.43) | 1003(23.81) | 1038(24.64) | 787(18.68) | 398(9.45) | 2.68 |
Training in nutritional value of eggs in schools | 572(13.58) | 789(17.83) | 989(23.47) | 1068(25.35) | 795(18.87) | 3.12 |
Advertising on egg consumption by popular people such as artists | 1190(28.25) | 1045(24.80) | 959(22.76) | 638(15.14) | 381(9.04) | 2.52 |
Knowledge of harmlessness of egg cholesterol | 434(10.30) | 665(15.78) | 1052(24.97) | 1202(28.53) | 890(20.41) | 3.31 |
Variations in the supply of eggs (such as new packaging, etc.) | 1059(25.41) | 870(20.65) | 1170(27.77) | 681(16.16) | 433(10.98) | 2.65 |
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of egg consumption per week among families of Tehran in 2018 |
Figure 2. Average egg consumption/person per week in 22 regions of Tehran in 2018 |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |