, Natthakan Kanchana, Preechayapa Silarod, Bongkochnuch Ruangpum, Kannatcha Phengkrajang, Onpreeya Chumjit, Punyada Seesod, Patcharin Janhom, Paphatsara Uaongnarat, Chayuttapong Benjaprom, Woranitta Petsiri, Natbodin Jueajaiamnart, Niratchaporn Thanopajai, Lukkamol Prapkree
| ARTICLE INFO | ABSTRACT | |
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE | Background: Vitamin C is an essential nutrient vital for optimal human health. Previous findings have indicated the potential benefits of vitamin C on bone mineral density (BMD) and peripheral arterial quality through various mechanical pathways. However, the effectiveness of vitamin C supplementation on BMD and peripheral arterial quality remains controversial. Methods: A total of 60 healthy participants were recruited and randomly allocated into control (n=30) and intervention (n=30) groups. Background data such as body composition were collected from all participants using BODPOD. Additionally, BMD measurements of wrist and ankle were obtained using an Osteo checker device, and peripheral arterial quality was assessed using the Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) device at baseline. The intervention group received daily vitamin C supplementation of 100 mg per 1 tablet for 12 weeks, whereas the control group maintained their routine dietary habits. All parameters were reassessed at week 12 (endpoint). Results: At endpoint, ankle BMD values in the intervention group were significantly higher than in the control group (P<0.05). Moreover, the intervention group demonstrated significantly higher peripheral arterial quality in both right and left brachial ABI and right and significantly lower left ankle Arterial Stiffness Index (ASI) compared to the control group at endpoint (P<0.05). Dietary habits, including energy and calcium intake, showed no significant differences between groups. Conclusions: Daily vitamin C supplementation of 100 mg appeared to be potentially effective for improving BMD and ABI values among participants in this study. However, further study is needed with larger participant groups and longer duration to confirm these findings. | |
| Article history: Received:6 Jun 2025 Revised: 26 Jul 2025 Accepted: 21 Aug 2025 |
||
| *Corresponding author narisar@go.buu.ac.th Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Burapha University, Chonburi, Thailand. Postal code: 20131 Tel: +66 0647467547 |
||
| Keywords Ankle brachial index; Bone mineral density; Peripheral arterial quality; Vitamin C; DEXA. |
| Table 1. Participants' background and characteristics of both groups. |
|||
| Parameters | Control group (n=30) |
Intervention group (n=30) |
P-value |
| Sex Male Female |
11 (36) c 19 (64) |
7 (23) 23 (77) |
0.39a |
| Age (y) | 22.26±1.99d | 23.13±2.33 | 0.12b |
| Occupation Part-time employee Businessperson |
24 (80) 6 (20) |
21 (73) 9 (27) |
0.76a |
| Education Bachelor’s degree Graduate degree |
27 (90) 3 (10) |
23 (77) 7 (23) |
0.29a |
| Length of weekly exercise (minute) | 78.66±77.09 | 97.16±70.75 | 0.33b |
| Length of daily sun exposure (minute) | 35.56±17.94 | 41.66±24.65 | 0.27b |
| a: Fisher's exact test; b: Independent t-test; c: n(%); d: Mean±SD. | |||
| Table 2. BMD values of participants at baseline to endpoint in both groups. | |||
| Parameters | Control group (30) | Intervention group (30) | P-valueb |
| T-score of wrist Baseline Endpoint P-valuec |
-1.24± 0.90a -1.12±0.94 0.61 |
-1.09±1.06 -1.03±1.02 0.82 |
0.56 0.71 |
| BMD of wrist (g/cm2) Baseline Endpoint P-value |
0.44±0.04 0.46±0.05 0.09 |
0.46±0.05 0.49±0.08 0.08 |
0.30 0.10 |
| T-score of ankle Baseline Endpoint P-value |
-1.00±1.13 -0.94±1.30 0.84 |
-0.87±1.17 -0.83±1.25 0.89 |
0.75 <0.05* |
| BMD of ankle (g/cm2) Baseline Endpoint P-value |
0.42±0.02 0.43±0.03 0.90 |
0.41±0.02 0.46±0.03 <0.05* |
0.11 <0.05* |
| a: Mean± SD; b: Independent t-test; c: Paired t-test; BMD: Bone mineral density. | |||
| Table 3. Peripheral arteries quality scores of participants at baseline to endpoint in both groups. | |||
| Parameters | Control group (30) | Intervention group (30) | P-valueb |
| Right ABI Baseline Endpoint P-valuec |
0.92±0.17 0.93±0.13 0.79 |
0.91±0.13 1.01±0.14 <0.05* |
0.74 <0.05* |
| Left ABI Baseline Endpoint P-value |
0.93±0.13 0.90±0.14 0.39 |
0.91±0.13 0.98±0.14 0.05 |
0.58 <0.05* |
| Right brachial ASI Baseline Endpoint P-value |
56.86±7.52 55.96±7.53 0.64 |
57.36±7.91 53.73±8.30 0.09 |
0.80 0.28 |
| Left brachial ASI Baseline Endpoint P-value |
57.46±6.25 56.90±5.52 0.71 |
56.96±7.87 56.20±7.78 0.70 |
0.78 0.69 |
| Right ankle ASI Baseline Endpoint P-value |
99.43±25.89 97.06±22.44 0.70 |
100.76±20.68 86.70 ±12.93 <0.05* |
0.82 <0.05* |
| Left ankle ASI Baseline Endpoint P-value |
91.40±12.77 91.26±13.12 0.96 |
90.23±13.94 77.50±13.02 <0.05* |
0.73 <0.05* |
| a: Mean± SD; b: Independent t-test; c: Paired t-test; ABI: Ankle Brachial Index; ASI: Arterial Stiffness Index. | |||
| Table 4. Body composition data of participants at baseline to endpoint in both groups. | |||
| Parameters | Control group (30) | Intervention group (30) | P-valueb |
| Thoracic gas volume (l) Baseline Endpoint P-valuec |
3.13±0.22 3.08±0.21 0.37 |
3.19±0.25) 3.14±0.18 0.37 |
0.36 0.22 |
| Percentage of body fat Baseline Endpoint P-value |
20.52±3.00 20.79±2.43 0.70 |
20.18±2.41 20.09±2.23 0.88 |
0.63 0.25 |
| Percentage of fat free mass Baseline Endpoint P-value |
79.48±3.00 79.02±2.43 0.51 |
79.81±2.41 79.90±2.23 0.88 |
0.63 0.25 |
| Fat mass (kg) Baseline Endpoint P-value |
16.64±2.35 16.84±2.49 0.75 |
17.56±1.20 17.75±1.74 0.62 |
0.06 0.10 |
| Body fluid (l) Baseline Endpoint P-value |
30.84±3.29 30.65±3.44 0.82 |
30.64±3.18 31.08±2.93 0.57 |
0.81 0.60 |
| Muscle mass (kg) Baseline Endpoint P-value |
19.98±3.33 19.82±3.25 0.85 |
19.70±2.95 19.42±2.93 0.71 |
0.73 0.62 |
| Weight from minerals (kg) Baseline Endpoint P-value |
2.54±0.27 2.63±0.35 0.26 |
2.61±0.32 2.94±0.32 <0.05* |
0.41 <0.05* |
| Energy requirement (kcal) Baseline Endpoint P-value |
1,802±200 1,837±205 0.50 |
1,817±194 1,843±169 0.58 |
0.80 0.90 |
| a: Mean± SD; b: Independent t-test; c: Paired t-test. | |||
| Table 5. Participants' dietary habits. | |||
| Nutrients consumed | Control group (n=30) | Intervention group (n=30) | P-valuea |
| Percentage energy from carbohydrate | 57.36±5.06 | 55.90±4.74 | 0.25 |
| Percentage energy from protein | 14.16±2.52 | 13.86±2.22 | 0.62 |
| Percentage energy from fat | 28.46±4.76 | 30.23±5.22 | 0.17 |
| Daily vitamin C intake (mg) | 75.76±18.80 | 180.63±16.76 | <0.05 |
| Daily Ca intake (mg) | 570.66±165.15 | 627.06±166.68 | 0.19 |
| a: independent t-test. | |||
Kanchana N, Silarod P, Ruangpum B, Phengkrajang K, Chumjit O, Seesod P, Janhom P, Uaongnarat P, Benjaprom C, Petsiri W, Jueajaiamnart N, and Thanopajai N collected the data. Rueangsri N conceptualized the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. Prapkree L conceptualized the study and proofread the manuscript. All authors read the manuscript and approved its publication.
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |