Food security is a critical issue in South Papua, where socio-cultural and environmental factors demand locally tailored policies. This study explores the transformation of food security policy evaluation through a multi-stakeholder approach involving indigenous communities, local governments, the private sector, and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). The approach integrates diverse perspectives and innovative strategies to enhance policy relevance, sustainability, and effectiveness. Methods: This research employs a qualitative case study method, using data from in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), participatory observations, and document analysis. Stakeholders provided insights into local challenges and policy implementation. Participatory mapping and data analytics further enhanced evaluation accuracy and depth, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of diverse perspectives on food security policies. Results: Stakeholder collaboration improves policy relevance by integrating indigenous knowledge into resource management, promoting accountability, transparency, and responsiveness. Technology tools like participatory mapping enhanced evaluation accuracy. However, challenges such as coordination inefficiencies and limited access to technology hinder optimal policy implementation. Conclusion: The multi-stakeholder approach effectively transforms food security policy evaluation in South Papua, making it more relevant and sustainable. Addressing coordination challenges and investing in infrastructure are crucial for overcoming persistent barriers.