Volume 8, Issue 2 (May 2023)                   JNFS 2023, 8(2): 276-282 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohit M, Mousavinezhad H, Mohsenpour M A, Golestaneh M A, Yousefinejad A. The Relationship between Dietary Intake, Obesity and Shift Working on Employees of Pasargad Petrochemical Company in Asaluyeh, Iran. JNFS 2023; 8 (2) :276-282
URL: http://jnfs.ssu.ac.ir/article-1-558-en.html
Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Full-Text [PDF 467 kb]   (302 Downloads)     |   Abstract (HTML)  (1470 Views)
Full-Text:   (114 Views)

The Relationship between Dietary Intake, Obesity and Shift Working on Employees of Pasargad Petrochemical Company in Asaluyeh, Iran


Mohsen Mohit; PhD candidate*1,2, Houri Mousavinezhad; BSc2, Mohammad Ali Mohsenpour; PhD candidate1,
Mohammad Amin Golestaneh; BSc3, Abbas Yousefinejad; PhD4

1 Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; 2 Cardiovascular Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; 3 Student Research Committee, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran; 4 Department of Nutrition, Sarvestan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sarvestan, Iran.
ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Background: Shift work in services and industry is increasing in developing countries, especially industrialized ones, due to the need for a flexible workforce and to achieve maximum efficiency. Shift working can cause problems for people's health and bodily functions. This study aims to determine the relationship between dietary intake, obesity, and shift working among employees of Pasargad Petrochemical Company. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted on 119 employees within the age range of 25-60 years and an average body mass index (BMI) of 25.67. Their food intakes were extracted using Food Frequency Questionnaires. Data analysis was performed through STATA data analysis software. Results: 119 male participants with a mean age of 33.62 ±7.12 year were included in the study, of whom 64.7% were non-shift workers and 35.3% were shift workers. The daily calorie intake of the participants was 2864.54 ± 1184.43 kcal. Although non-shift workers consumed a higher but insignificant amount of energy, no statistical differences were found in dietary intake between shift workers and non-shift workers (P<0.05). Furthermore, multiple linear regressions regarding shift work did not have a significant effect on BMI and waist circumference. Conclusion: Although no statistically significant relationship was found between food intake and shift work, it is suggested that future studies be conducted with a larger sample size because of the importance of shift work.

Keywords: Shift work schedule; Diet; Body mass index; Obesity; Dietary intake;
Article history:
Received: 14 Jan 2022
Revised: 19 Feb 2022
Accepted: 29 Feb 2022
*Corresponding author
Mohsen.Mohit20@yahoo.com
Student Research Committee, Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.


Postal code: 7153675500
Tel: +98 71 37251001

Introduction
Shift work, as work done outside normal working hours during the day, is increasing in developing and industrialized countries, that results in more than 20% of the employed population being shift workers (Gordon et al., 1986). Moreover, it is closely linked to metabolic disorders such as diabetes and cardiovascular disease. Many factors affecting shift workers including circadian rhythms and eating habits are risk factors for health (Kervezee et al., 2020). Studies have indicated that the risk of cardiovascular disease may increase with shift-working (Lunde et al., 2020).
 Obesity is also known to be one of the most important causes of coronary heart disease (Björntorp, 1998, Diba et al., 2018, Mehri and Babri, 2021, Mehri et al., 2019, Oskuye et al., 2019, Valenzuela et al., 2023), which is significantly more common among shift-workers (Orth-Gomer, 1983, Romon et al., 1992).
The circadian rhythm disorders in shift workers can lead to poor eating habits. Inadequate eating patterns in the long run, along with other unhealthy habits such as insufficient sleep and increased stress levels, expose these people to overweight and various diseases, including cardiovascular disease (Ghanbary Sartang et al., 2016). Shift workers tend to eat at the wrong time; this can increase circadian rhythm disorders as well. (Rogers et al., 2004) The results of a study demonstrated that 20-75% of shift workers suffer from digestive problems such as heartburn, abdominal pain, constipation, indigestion, and bloating (Costa, 1996). Eating fast, the tendency to eat fast food, and consuming high amounts of caffeine are other eating habits formed among shift workers. The formation of improper eating habits over time impacts appetite cycles, hunger, satiety, and metabolism. Following the formation of poor eating habits, food intake including micro and macro-nutrients, can be affected (Lowden et al., 2010).
Few studies have been conducted to assess and diagnose physiological problems in shift workers, especially in Iran (Choobineh et al., 2018, Hoboubi et al., 2017). Since many of these problems are related to biochemical disorders, the role of nutrition in these workers is very important. Therefore, this study is designed to investigate the relationship between nutritional intake, obesity, and shift working among employees of Pasargad Petrochemical Company.
Materials and Methods
Design and participants: This was a cross-sectional observational study. The protocol of study was approved by the ethics committee of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences. The sample consisted of non-shift workers and shift workers of Pasargad Petrochemical Company, Assaluyeh, Iran. One hundred thirty four non-shift workers and shift workers aged 25-50 years were selected. Inclusion criteria were: 1- Being an employee of Pasargad Petrochemical Company, 2- Being a male in the age range of 25 - 50, 3- Having the willingness to participate in the study, 4- Having at least one year of work experience. Exclusion criteria were: 1- Unwillingness to cooperate, 2- Having chronic diseases (diabetes, cancer, cardiovascular, etc.)
 The employees were divided into two groups i.e. non-shit work and shift work. In the next step, the study was informed to all petrochemical employees with distribution of posters. They were visited during their work shifts and eligible employees were included in the study.
Measurements: Two researchers filled the questionnaires. The questionnaires included different kinds of information. The first questionnaire asked about demographic characteristics completed through interviews. This questionnaire recorded age; marital status; education; work status (shift worker or non-shift worker); diet; and having a family history of obesity, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cancer, high blood pressure, heart attack, and stroke. Another one was a 3-day 24-hour food recall questionnaire, which was completed by a trained nutritionist through interviews with employees. The third questionnaire completed was a 168-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Foods were recorded based on household scales. For this purpose, food items were converted to grams per day and analyzed by the Nutritionist IV software to estimate daily energy intake, and macro- and micro-nutrients.
Weight was measured using Seca scale (Germany) with an accuracy of 100 grams. A Seca satdiometer (Germany) was used to measure height with an accuracy of 0.5 cm, where participants had no shoes or hat, and stood straight. Waist circumference (WC) and hip circumference (HC) measurements were taken using a non-elastic tape measure with an accuracy of 0.1 cm. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight (kg) by square of the height (m).
Ethical considerations: The study protocol was approved by the Board of Ethics of Bushehr University of Medical Sciences (Ir.bpums. rec.1395.26).
 Data analysis: Data analysis was done using STATA software version 14. Categorical and continuous variables were summarized using number (%) and mean ± standard deviation, respectively. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine distribution of data. Chi-square and independent-sample t-tests were used to determine if any significant differences exist between observed and expected values in categorical and continuous data respectively. To determine the variables affecting WC and BMI, a simple linear regression was used. Variables with a significance level of less than 0.2 were entered into the multiple linear models. The coefficient and 95% confidence interval of the coefficient was reported for the effect size. The significance level was considered less than 0.05.
Results
From the 119 males with a mean age of 33.62±7.12 year, 64.7% were non-shift workers and 35.3% were shift workers. Non-shift and shift workers were not significantly different in terms of anthropometric indices. Table 1 shows the demographic and anthropometric characteristics of employees.
Table 2 shows the participants' food intake.
The daily calorie intake of the participants was 2864.54 ± 1184.43 kcal. It should be noted that there was no statistical difference between non-shift and shift workers despite receiving a higher but insignificant amount of calorie intake by non-shift workers (P = 0.50).

Tables 3 demonstrate the effect of shift work as well as the adjusted effect of other independent variables including age, energy, carbohydrates, protein, fat, and dietary fiber intake on BMI and WC, respectively. Although multiple linear regressions regarding shift work did not have a significant effect on BMI (0.952) and WC (0.357), each year through aging, BMI increases to 0.138 kg/m2 (P = 0.009, 95% CI: 0.035, 0.240 kg/m2), and WC increases to 0.402 cm (P = 0.001, 95% CI: 0.171, 0.632 cm).
Table 1. Demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the studied population based on job status.
Variables Total population (N= 119) Non-shift workers (N = 77) Shift-workers (N = 42) P-value
Age (year) 33.62 ± 7.12a 33.38 ± 7.39 34.07 ± 6.67 0.61c
Weight (Kg) 78.16 ± 12.90 77.59 ± 13.86 79.21 ± 10.99 0.51c
Height (cm) 174.46 ± 5.97 173.89 ± 5.75 175.50 ± 6.28 0.16 c
BMI (kg/m2) 25.67 ± 4.01 25.63 ± 4.23 25.75 ± 3.62 0.87 c
WC (cm) 91.59 ± 9.32 92.06 ± 9.80 90.71 ± 8.42 0.45 c
HC (cm) 100.55 ± 7.45 100.88 ± 7.75 99.93 ± 6.92 0.50 c
WHR 0.91 ± 0.04 0.91 ± 0.05 0.90 ± 0.05 0.67 c
WHtR 0.52 ± 0.05 0.52 ± 0.05 0.51 ± 0.05 0.24 c
Weight status
   Normal

56 (47.1)b

39 (50.6)

17 (40.5)
0.20d


   Overweight 47 (39.5) 26 (33.8) 21 (50.0)
   Obese 16 (13.4) 12 (15.6) 4 (9.5)
WHR status
   Normal

51 (42.9)

33 (42.9)

18 (42.9)
1d

   High 68 (57.1) 44 (57.1) 24 (57.1)
WHtR status
   Normal

61 (51.3)

36 (46.8)

25 (59.5)
0.25d

   High 58 (48.7) 41 (53.2) 17 (40.5)
a: Mean ± SD, b: N (%), c: Independent sample t-test, d: Chi-square test, BMI: Body Mass Index; WC: Waist Circumference; HC: Hip Circumference; WHR: Waist to Hip Ratio; WHtR: Waist to Height Ratio
Table 2. Dietary intake of the studied population based on job status.
Dietary items Total population(N=119) Non-shift workers (N=77) Shift-workers (N=42) P-value b
Energy (kcal) 2894.76 ± 1159.15a 2942.09 ± 1279.58 2807.97 ± 905.57 0.54
Carbohydrate (g) 432.78 ± 184.37 438.84 ± 200.59 421.67 ± 151.83 0.62
Protein (g) 104.24 ± 37.61 105.01 ± 40.18 102.82 ± 32.78 0.76
Fat (g) 82.96 ± 41.73 85.18 ± 46.38 78.88 ± 31.60 0.43
Carbohydrate (%) 59.70 ± 7.11 59.66 ± 7.21 59.77 ± 7.01 0.93
Protein (%) 14.86 ± 3.35 14.84 ± 3.64 14.89 ± 2.79 0.93
Fat (%) 25.43 ± 5.67 25.49 ± 5.65 25.32 ± 5.79 0.87
SFA ( g/d ) 21.15 ± 13.00 21.93 ± 15.26 19.72 ± 7.17 0.37
MUFA ( g/d ) 22.49 ± 13.12 23.06 ± 14.73 21.44 ± 9.57 0.52
PUFA ( g/d ) 18.07 ± 10.75 17.87 ± 11.80 18.42 ± 8.61 0.79
Cholesterol (mg/d) 363.26 ± 230.67 380.09 ± 265.29 332.39 ± 145.52 0.28
Fiber ( g/d ) 33.09 ± 14.90 33.22 ± 14.79 32.85 ± 15.29 0.90
Sodium (mg/d) 3018.67 ± 2103.51 3081.53 ± 2386.95 2903.42 ± 1467.10 0.66
Potassium (mg/d) 5394.75 ± 2348.41 5476.94 ± 2494.49 5244.07 ± 2074.19 0.60
Magnesium (mg/d) 413.69 ± 182.22 420.31 ± 182.97 401.55 ± 182.42 0.59
Zinc (mg/d) 11.54 ± 4.62 11.68 ± 4.74 11.29 ± 4.45 0.66
Iron (mg/d) 20.14 ± 8.53 20.23 ± 8.84 19.97 ± 8.04 0.87
Calcium (mg/d) 1394.61 ± 670.72 1431.12 ± 703.78 1327.69 ± 607.86 0.42
Phosphorus (mg/d) 1734.48 ± 869.34 1763.40 ± 959.97 1681.48 ± 680.02 0.62
Copper  (mg/d) 2.06 ± 1.00 2.10 ± 0.99 1.99 ± 1.01 0.57
Vitamin A (μg/d) 1722.95 ± 1036.70 1843.18 ± 1169.25 1502.53 ± 692.06 0.08
Vitamin E (mg/d) 5.04 ± 2.69 5.00 ± 2.75 5.12 ± 2.60 0.81
Vitamin K  (mg/d) 170.51 ± 106.21 168.42 ± 107.56 174.34 ± 104.88 0.77
Vitamin C  (mg/d) 402.59 ± 244.01 418.28 ± 279.36 373.82 ± 159.36 0.34
Vitamin B1 (mg/d) 2.14 ± 0.89 2.16 ± 1.00 2.10 ± 0.66 0.71
Vitamin B2 (mg/d) 2.57 ± 1.17 2.61 ± 1.28 2.50 ± 0.94 0.64
Vitamin B3 (mg/d) 25.71 ± 10.17 25.17 ± 10.80 26.71 ± 8.95 0.43
Vitamin B5 (mg/d) 8.08 ± 3.56 8.05 ± 3.67 8.15 ± 3.38 0.87
Vitamin B6 (mg/d) 2.72 ± 1.11 2.72 ± 1.14 2.72 ± 1.05 0.96
Vitamin B9 (mg/d) 453.40 ± 202.39 450.10 ± 193.72 459.44 ± 219.71 0.81
Vitamin B12 (μg/d) 4.18 ± 2.03 4.26 ± 2.14 4.05 ± 1.84 0.58
Biotin (mg/d) 30.77 ± 16.63 29.78 ± 15.17 32.59 ± 19.08 0.38
a: Mean ± SD, b: N (%), b: Independent sample t-test, SFA: Saturated Fatty Acids; MUFA: Mono-Unsaturated Fatty Acids; PUFA: Poly-Unsaturated Fatty Acids.
Table 3. Multiple regression analysis showing adjusted coefficient and statistical significance for body mass index and waist circumference.
Body mass index Waist circumference
Coefficient P-value 95 % CI of β Coefficient P-value 95 % CI of β
Lower Upper Lower Upper
Job Status 0.046 0.952 - 1.467 1.559 - 1.532 0.375 - 4.940 1.876
Age 0.138 0.009 0.035 0.240 0.402 0.001 0.171 0.632
Energy 0.001 0.336 - 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.089 - 0.001 0.005
Carbohydrate 0.002 0.577 - 0.001 0.011 0.001 0.846 - 0.017 0.021
Protein - 0.003 0.839 - 0.040 0.032 - 0.015 0.715 - 0.097 0.067
Fat - 0.018 0.251 - 0.049 0.013 - 0.046 0.196 - 0.117 0.024
Dietary Fiber - 0.014 0.729 - 0.098 0.068 - 0.071 0.454 - 0.259 0.116



Discussion
The results of the present study indicated that there was no statistically significant difference between non-shift workers and shift workers regarding anthropometric indices and dietary food intake. Nowadays, in the service and industry sectors, to achieve maximum productivity and a flexible workforce, employees' employment status may alternate between day and night shifts. On the other hand, shift work can cause problems for employees' health and their biological order (Gordon et al., 1986).
 In the present study, shift and non-shift workers were not significantly different in terms of anthropometric figures. It should be noted that BMI was higher in shift workers; however, there was no significant difference. The results of a cohort study showed that shift work could be considered a risk factor for being overweight (Morikawa et al., 2007).
Based on the results, dietary intake was higher in non-shift workers compared with shift workers; but, this difference was not statistically significant. The highest amount of carbohydrate intake and the lowest amount of fiber, iron, zinc, calcium, and phosphorus intake belonged to shift workers. Studies reported that shift workers consumed more starchy foods, alcohol and sweets, which can increase their digestive problems (Zhao and Turner, 2008). Moreover, the eating habits and food choices of these workers have changed (De Assis et al., 2003, Tepas, 1990). Long working hours and lack of breaks between work,  unhealthy food choices, and lack of physical activity are all the causes of poor eating habits (Ragland et al., 1998). In another study on 455 shift-work nurses, there was a significant negative relationship between dietary patterns and health outcomes of shift work (r = 0.183, P < 0.005) (Rahimi Pordanjani et al., 2018). Differences in sample size, gender, and the study group can be the reasons for the difference in the results.
Previous studies revealed that obesity, as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, was considerably more common among shift workers (Karlsson et al., 2001, Van Amelsvoort et al., 1999). Similarly, overweight has been reported to be even higher in these individuals.The working environment, an effective factor in weight gain and obesity is a very important and influential factor regarding food habits and physical activity among shift workers (Geliebter et al., 2000, Mehri and Babri, 2021, Mehri et al., 2019).
In the present study, the effect of shift work as well as the adjusted effect of other independent variables, including age, energy, carbohydrates, protein, fat, and dietary fiber intake, on BMI and WC were investigated. Multiple linear regression regarding shift work did not have a significant effect on BMI and WC. However, a significant relationship was observed between age and BMI as well as age and WC. Interventional studies demonstrated that a proper shift schedule improves biochemical parameters, and in contrast, using an inappropriate shift schedule causes weight gain in workers (Bøggild and Jeppesen, 2001, Yamada et al., 2001). Therefore, it can be concluded that working environment and conditions can affect employees' nutritional status and eating habits, and the role of proper nutrition in preventing many physiological problems among shift workers should not be ignored.
Conclusions
There was no significant difference in food intake and overweight between shift and non-shift workers. However, according to the results of other studies such as changes in the sleep cycle and higher work stress in shift workers, and also reports of more diseases among shift workers. It is suggested that future studies be performed on a larger sample size and among other working groups as well.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all the participants in this study for their cooperation.
Authors’ contributions
Mohit M and Golestaneh MA collected the data. Mousavinezhad H and Mohsenpour MA performed the analyses. Yousefinejad A received financial for undertaking this study. All authors contributed to writing the draft of the manuscript and revising it, and all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
  Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflict of interest.
References
Björntorp P 1998. Obesity: a chronic disease with alarming prevalence and consequences. Journal of internal medicine, 244(4), pp.267-269. 244 (4): 267-269.
Bøggild H & Jeppesen HJ 2001. Intervention in shift scheduling and changes in biomarkers of heart disease in hospital wards. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 27 (2): 87-96.
Choobineh A, Javadpour F, Azmoon H, Keshavarzi S & Daneshmandi H 2018. The prevalence of fatigue, sleepiness, and sleep disorders among petrochemical employees in Iran. Fatigue: Biomedicine, health & behavior. 6 (3): 153-162.
Costa G 1996. The impact of shift and night work on health. Applied ergonomics. 27 (1): 9-16.
De Assis MAA, Nahas M, Bellisle F & Kupek E 2003. Meals, snacks and food choices in Brazilian shift workers with high energy expenditure. Journal of human nutrition and dietetics. 16 (4): 283-289.
Diba R, et al. 2018. Protective effects of troxerutin on maternal high-fat diet-induced impairments of spatial memory and apelin in the male offspring. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences. 21 (7): 682.
Geliebter A, Gluck ME, Tanowitz M, Aronoff NJ & Zammit GK 2000. Work-shift period and weight change. Nutrition. 16 (1): 27-29.
Ghanbary Sartang A, Dehghan H & Abbaspoor Darbandy A 2016. Comparison of Health Promoting Life style in rotating shift work vs fixed shift work Nurses. Iranian journal of rehabilitation research. 2 (2): 32-38.
Gordon NP, Cleary PD, Parker CE & Czeisler CA 1986. The prevalence and health impact of shiftwork. American journal of public health. 76 (10): 1225-1228.
Hoboubi N, Choobineh A, Ghanavati FK, Keshavarzi S & Hosseini AA 2017. The impact of job stress and job satisfaction on workforce productivity in an Iranian petrochemical industry. Safety and health at work. 8 (1): 67-71.
Karlsson B, Knutsson A & Lindahl B 2001. Is there an association between shift work and having a metabolic syndrome? Results from a population based study of 27 485 people. Occupational and environmental medicine. 58 (11): 747-752.
Kervezee L, Kosmadopoulos A & Boivin DB 2020. Metabolic and cardiovascular consequences of shift work: The role of circadian disruption and sleep disturbances. European journal of neuroscience. 51 (1): 396-412.
Lowden A, Moreno C, Holmbäck U, Lennernäs M & Tucker P 2010. Eating and shift work-effects on habits, metabolism, and performance. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 36 (2): 150-162.
Lunde L-K, et al. 2020. Cardiovascular health effects of shift work with long working hours and night shifts: study protocol for a three-year prospective follow-up study on industrial workers. International journal of environmental research and public health. 17 (2): 589.
Mehri K & Babri S 2021. The Effect of Troxerutin on Apelin-13 and Its Receptor Gene Expression in Ovarian of Pregnant Rats Fed a High-fat diet. Journal of Fasa University of medical sciences. 11 (3): 3958-3966.
Mehri K, et al. 2019. Effect of troxerutin on apelin-13, apelin receptors (APJ), and ovarian histological changes in the offspring of high-fat diet fed rats. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences. 22 (6): 637.
Morikawa Y, et al. 2007. Effect of shift work on body mass index and metabolic parameters. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 33 (1): 45-50.
Orth-Gomer K 1983. Intervention on coronary risk factors by adapting a shift work schedule to biologic rhythmicity. Psychosomatic medicine. 45 (5): 407-415.
Oskuye ZZ, et al. 2019. Troxerutin affects the male fertility in prepubertal type 1 diabetic male rats. Iranian journal of basic medical sciences. 22 (2): 197.
Ragland DR, Krause N, Greiner BA & Fisher JM 1998. Studies of health outcomes in transit operators: Policy implications of the current scientific database. Journal of occupational health psychology. 3 (2): 172.
Rahimi Pordanjani T, Mohamadzade Ebrahimi A & Kiani F 2018. Correlation between sport activity, nutritional patterns and drug abuse with shifting health outcomes in nurses. Journal of health promotion management. 7 (4): 41-47.
Rogers AE, Hwang W-T, Scott LD, Aiken LH & Dinges DF 2004. The working hours of hospital staff nurses and patient safety. Health affairs. 23 (4): 202-212.
Romon M, et al. 1992. Increased triglyceride levels in shift workers. American journal of medicine. 93 (3): 259-262.
Tepas DI 1990. Do eating and drinking habits interact with work schedule variables? Work & Stress. 4 (3): 203-211.
Valenzuela PL, et al. 2023. Obesity and the risk of cardiometabolic diseases. Nature reviews cardiology. 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-41023-00847-41565.
Van Amelsvoort L, Schouten E & Kok F 1999. Duration of shiftwork related to body mass index and waist to hip ratio. International journal of obesity. 23 (9): 973-978.
Yamada Y, et al. 2001. Excessive fatigue and weight gain among cleanroom workers after changing from an 8-hour to a 12-hour shift. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health. 27 (5): 318-326.
Zhao I & Turner C 2008. The impact of shift work on people's daily health habits and adverse health outcomes. Australian journal of advanced nursing. 25 (3): 8-22.


 
Type of article: orginal article | Subject: public specific
Received: 2022/01/14 | Published: 2023/05/20 | ePublished: 2023/05/20

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 3.0 | Journal of Nutrition and Food Security

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb